Economics●●●●●Difficulty 4 of 5

Did James Watt's patent hold back the steam engine?

A patent extended until 1800 made Boulton and Watt's fortune, and within two years of its expiry, engines running at high pressure appeared. Cause, or coincidence?

▶ Start the story

Possibly, but the evidence is split, and the split is the interesting part. Some accounts say that Watt's patent prevented others from making high-pressure and compound engines. Others say Watt himself held back from high pressure for a good reason: boilers of his time were dangerous.

Here is the case for the patent. Matthew Boulton acquired Watt's patent rights, and an extension of the patent to 1800 was obtained in 1775, the year Boulton and Watt formed their partnership. The partnership produced 496 engines between 1775 and 1800. Patents even cut into their own work: when a patent on the crank blocked them, they went around it with their sun and planet gear in 1781. Shortly after Watt's patent expired in 1800, Richard Trevithick and, separately, Oliver Evans in 1801 introduced high-pressure engines that were much more powerful for a given cylinder size and small enough for transport.

Here is the other reading: the brake was Watt's own caution, not the patent. Watt restricted his use of high-pressure steam because of the danger of exploding boilers. His biographer John Griffiths argues that Watt's discouragement of Murdoch's work on high-pressure steam did delay its development, while noting that Watt rightly believed the boilers of his time would be unsafe at higher pressures.

Two readings

The patent held it back

  • It prevented others from making high-pressure engines
  • Trevithick built engines to avoid royalties
  • Patent trials were costly in money and time

Watt was careful

  • Boilers were primitive and could explode
  • All his engines ran at near atmospheric pressure
  • Murdoch had already shown strong steam in 1784

The fight over the patent was real. Cornish mine owners, convinced the patent could not be enforced, withheld payments: only £2,500 of £21,000 owed had been received by 1795, and the costly trials ended in the firm's favour.

Quiz me

0/3

  1. 1.What did the Cornish mine owners do about Watt's patent?
  2. 2.What is the main defence of Watt's restraint on high-pressure steam?
  3. 3.What follows the expiry of Watt's patent in 1800?

Recap

Watt's patent and his caution on boiler safety both fit the record, and high-pressure engines arrived soon after 1800.

💡 A trick to remember it · Fence or fuse? One reading says the patent fenced rivals out until 1800; the other says Watt kept his steam low for fear of the boiler blowing.

Surprising fact · Only £2,500 of £21,000 owed to Boulton and Watt had been paid by 1795, and the court cases cost heavily.

Sources (4)

No source, no claim. Every fact in this lesson (16 claims) cites at least one of these.

  1. [1]James Watt · Wikipedia
  2. [2]Richard Trevithick · Wikipedia
  3. [3]Steam engine · Wikipedia
  4. [4]Boulton and Watt · Wikipedia
More lessons in 💰 Economics (3) See all economics lessons →

One more light on your map.

Get one lesson like this every day, about the things you love. Free, in two or five minutes.

Get the share card for this lesson ↗