History●●●●●Difficulty 4 of 5

How did Houdini take on the Boston medium 'Margery'?

In 1924 a magazine offered a cash prize to any medium who could prove supernatural powers under test. One contender, a Boston medium, had Sherlock Holmes's creator on her side and Houdini on the committee.

▶ Start the story

In 1924 the magazine Scientific American offered a prize to any medium who could demonstrate telekinetic ability under scientific controls. One candidate was Mina Crandon, the wife of a wealthy Boston surgeon, who performed as 'Margery' and claimed to channel her dead brother, Walter Stinson. With a doctor as husband, she was well prepared for the challenge, and her charm and lack of interest in personal monetary reward made her seem honest to the public. Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, the author of Sherlock Holmes, touted her abilities.

The prize committee had a Harvard psychology professor, two psychical researchers, a Technicolor pioneer and Harry Houdini. Houdini turned his energies in the 1920s toward debunking mediums in order to show how they were taking advantage of the bereaved, and his training in magic allowed him to expose frauds who had successfully fooled many scientists and academics. After two sittings, Houdini said Margery had escaped control and stretched her foot to ring a bell in the séance room.

Houdini then asked her to wear a large cabinet-box that prevented her from using her legs, leaving only her head and hands sticking out. The bell rang, but when the lights came on the lid of the cabinet-box had been forced open, and Houdini claimed she had rung the bell herself. Under a stricter control, no paranormal phenomena were observed, and Margery did not win the prize.

The Margery tests, 1924
  1. 23 June 1924

    Her husband submits her for the Scientific American prize

  2. 23-24 July

    Houdini attends two séances and says she rang the bell with her foot

  3. 25 August

    She is placed in the cabinet-box; the bell rings and the lid is found forced open

  4. 27 August

    Under strict control, no paranormal phenomena are observed

That was not the end of the argument. Doyle refused to credit any of Houdini's exposés and came to believe that Houdini himself was a powerful spiritualist medium, using those abilities to block the powers of the mediums he supposedly debunked. Houdini turned his efforts into his stage act, reproducing her effects for audiences.

Quiz me

0/3

  1. 1.What was the key difference between the séance where the bell rang and the one with strict control?
  2. 2.Why did Houdini's training in magic matter for this investigation?
  3. 3.How should we describe the 'ruler incident' that is part of the story?

Recap

Restrict the medium's hands and feet and the spirits went quiet.

💡 A trick to remember it · Tie the feet, mute the spirit: once Margery's legs were locked down, the bell went quiet.

Surprising fact · Conan Doyle believed that Houdini himself was a powerful medium.

Sources (2)

No source, no claim. Every fact in this lesson (30 claims) cites at least one of these.

  1. [1]Mina Crandon · Wikipedia
  2. [2]Harry Houdini · Wikipedia
More lessons in 🏛 History (3) See all history lessons →

One more light on your map.

Get one lesson like this every day, about the things you love. Free, in two or five minutes.

Get the share card for this lesson ↗