Space●●●●●Difficulty 4 of 5

What was the Wow! signal, and why can't astronomers explain it?

Six characters on a 1977 printout record a radio signal that rose and fell exactly as a distant source on the sky would. It never came back.

▶ Start the story

It was a radio burst, caught on August 15, 1977 by Ohio State University's Big Ear telescope, that behaved the way a distant source on the sky would. A volunteer, Jerry Ehman, was going through data printed on line printer paper when he found a run of characters reading 6EQUJ5. He circled it and wrote "Wow!" beside it. Despite the popular idea, the string is not a coded message: it records the signal's intensity over time.

Why the excitement? The printout's highest value, "U", means an intensity thirty standard deviations above background noise. Big Ear swept the sky using Earth's rotation, so a steady source should be visible for 72 seconds, rising for the first 36 and falling after, and the Wow! signal showed these characteristics. Its frequency, close to the hydrogen line at 1420 megahertz, was the one Morrison and Cocconi had suggested in 1959 an extraterrestrial civilization might use.

30σ

the Wow! signal's peak, thirty standard deviations above background noise

The trouble is that nobody has ever seen it again. Follow-up searches, including with the more sensitive Very Large Array, found nothing, and the signal has never recurred. No explanation, terrestrial or otherwise, has been confirmed. As Douglas Vakoch has put it, the lack of replication means the Wow! signal has little credibility, while Ehman himself, in a 1997 paper, cautioned against "drawing vast conclusions from half-vast data". It is a strong signal with a missing second observation.

Quiz me

0/3

  1. 1.What does the 6EQUJ5 string on the printout represent?
  2. 2.Why did the 72-second shape of the signal count in favor of a source on the sky?
  3. 3.Why do many astronomers give the Wow! signal little weight as evidence of aliens?

Recap

The Wow! signal fit what a distant source would do but was never replicated, so no explanation has been confirmed.

💡 A trick to remember it · A single footprint on a beach with no trail: neat shape, but with no second print you cannot say what walked there.

Surprising fact · The 6EQUJ5 string is not a coded message but a record of the signal's intensity over time.

Sources (1)

No source, no claim. Every fact in this lesson (23 claims) cites at least one of these.

  1. [1]Wow! signal · Wikipedia
More lessons in 🌌 Space (3) See all space lessons →

One more light on your map.

Get one lesson like this every day, about the things you love. Free, in two or five minutes.

Get the share card for this lesson ↗