Film●●●●●Difficulty 5 of 5

Why do almost-human faces creep us out, and is the uncanny valley even real?

A baby in a 1988 Pixar short made audiences uneasy, and the idea it helped bring to Hollywood is still disputed by the scientists who test it.

▶ Start the story

Nobody agrees on a single reason, and some researchers doubt the effect is one thing at all. The uncanny valley hypothesis predicts that an entity appearing almost human will elicit uncanny or eerie feelings in viewers. The robotics professor Masahiro Mori introduced the concept in 1970, in his book Bukimi No Tani. As he described it, as a robot is made more human the emotional response grows more positive, until it becomes almost human, at which point the response quickly becomes strong revulsion; as the robot becomes less distinguishable from a person, the response turns positive again.

Mori's curve in words
  1. Step 1: Looks like a machine

    Becoming more human makes the response more positive

  2. Step 2: Almost human

    The response quickly becomes strong revulsion: the valley

  3. Step 3: Indistinguishable from human

    The response is positive again, approaching human-to-human empathy

Animation ran into it. According to the roboticist Dario Floreano, the baby character Billy in Pixar's 1988 short Tin Toy provoked negative audience reactions that first caused the movie industry to consider the concept seriously. Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within (2001), one of the first photorealistic computer-animated features, provoked negative reactions from some viewers because of its near-realistic yet imperfect human characters, and several reviewers of The Polar Express (2004) called its animation eerie.

One explanation points to mismatch: the valley is often described as arising when something that looks mechanical moves like a human, or something that looks human moves mechanically. In an fMRI study of an android, researchers saw evidence of mismatch or perceptual conflict: the brain lit up when the android's human-like appearance and its robotic motion did not compute.

But the science is unsettled. A number of theories have been proposed for the mechanism, though support for each is inconsistent, and critics question whether the valley exists as a single phenomenon at all.

Quiz me

0/3

  1. 1.According to the lesson, when is the uncanny valley often said to be elicited?
  2. 2.Why do some researchers doubt the valley?
  3. 3.What did Mathur and Reichling find about category confusion?

Recap

The uncanny valley is a contested hypothesis: mismatch between look and movement is a leading idea, and critics doubt it is one single effect.

💡 A trick to remember it · Mori's curve dips just before the finish line: almost human can feel worse than plainly cartoon, if the valley is real.

Surprising fact · A 2022 study found little support for the valley in rhesus monkeys, while a 2009 study read monkeys' gaze as aversion to a realistic 3D face.

Sources (1)

No source, no claim. Every fact in this lesson (21 claims) cites at least one of these.

  1. [1]Uncanny valley · Wikipedia
More lessons in 🎬 Film (3) See all film lessons →

One more light on your map.

Get one lesson like this every day, about the things you love. Free, in two or five minutes.

Get the share card for this lesson ↗